AK Legend Gardens · Watering & Environment BaselineAK Legend Gardens · Línea Base de Riego y Clima

2-room cultivation audit · AK Legend Gardens (facility 4693) · 2026-05-27 → 2026-06-10 (REAL 14-day trace, raw ~9-min cadence stitched from AROYA public_api, 2-day windows merged). This is a first-touch baseline — no prior audit or commitment history for this site — so the read below is a clean health-check of what AROYA telemetry actually shows, built to answer the two questions you booked the call on: what does my watering look like, and is the environment supporting it? Phases are signal-inferred (the harvest-group roster was down this run), so phase labels are read from the data, not the AROYA calendar. The short version: (1) Flower Room 1 is your data room and it looks healthy. The TEROS substrate probes went into live media on ~2026-06-06; since then the room runs a clean overnight dryback of 20.1 pp absolute (peak VWC − pre-irrigation low) with peak VWC near 69% and pore EC stacking from ~2.5 to ~2.9 mS — a steerable, high-field-capacity substrate (reads rockwool-like). Two things to look at: the first shot of the day (P1 onset) is swinging ±2.6 h day-to-day, and there are essentially no P2 maintenance pulses — the day is one front-loaded ramp then a long dry-down. (2) Flower Room 2 is flying blind on water. It reads as flowering (~12 h photoperiod) but has only climate sensors, no substrate probes, so VWC, dryback, EC and shots can't be seen at all. That is the single biggest gap at the site — and you have spare TEROS probes sitting in inventory to fix it. (3) The environment is mostly fine, with one flag: Room 2's RH averages 71.2% (peaks 79.0%), which is high for a flowering room (~45–60% target) and worth pulling down as the buds fill in. Room 1's substrate also runs warm (~78.5°F). Data window: 2026-05-27 → 2026-06-10, ~98.5% timestamp coverage in both rooms. Both rooms have working CO₂ sensors (Room 1 ~1048 ppm, Room 2 ~1198 ppm). Shot counts and P1/P2 cadence in Room 1 are derived from VWC step-up signatures (≥0.8 pp rise between consecutive ~9-min samples) — no flow/runoff telemetry exists at this site (see Data Quality).2-room cultivation audit · AK Legend Gardens (facility 4693) · 2026-05-27 → 2026-06-10 (REAL 14-day trace, raw ~9-min cadence stitched from AROYA public_api, 2-day windows merged). This is a first-touch baseline — no prior audit or commitment history for this site — so the read below is a clean health-check of what AROYA telemetry actually shows, built to answer the two questions you booked the call on: what does my watering look like, and is the environment supporting it? Phases are signal-inferred (the harvest-group roster was down this run), so phase labels are read from the data, not the AROYA calendar. The short version: (1) Flower Room 1 is your data room and it looks healthy. The TEROS substrate probes went into live media on ~2026-06-06; since then the room runs a clean overnight dryback of 20.1 pp absolute (peak VWC − pre-irrigation low) with peak VWC near 69% and pore EC stacking from ~2.5 to ~2.9 mS — a steerable, high-field-capacity substrate (reads rockwool-like). Two things to look at: the first shot of the day (P1 onset) is swinging ±2.6 h day-to-day, and there are essentially no P2 maintenance pulses — the day is one front-loaded ramp then a long dry-down. (2) Flower Room 2 is flying blind on water. It reads as flowering (~12 h photoperiod) but has only climate sensors, no substrate probes, so VWC, dryback, EC and shots can't be seen at all. That is the single biggest gap at the site — and you have spare TEROS probes sitting in inventory to fix it. (3) The environment is mostly fine, with one flag: Room 2's RH averages 71.2% (peaks 79.0%), which is high for a flowering room (~45–60% target) and worth pulling down as the buds fill in. Room 1's substrate also runs warm (~78.5°F). Data window: 2026-05-27 → 2026-06-10, ~98.5% timestamp coverage in both rooms. Both rooms have working CO₂ sensors (Room 1 ~1048 ppm, Room 2 ~1198 ppm). Shot counts and P1/P2 cadence in Room 1 are derived from VWC step-up signatures (≥0.8 pp rise between consecutive ~9-min samples) — no flow/runoff telemetry exists at this site (see Data Quality).

• Phases are SIGNAL-INFERRED, not roster-verified — the harvest-group roster was unavailable this run (AROYA app / SPA session down) and there's no prior cache for this site, so phase labels are read from steering signatures (photoperiod, dryback depth, pore-EC trajectory, VPD). Treat them as approximate until re-verified against a live roster pull. This is a first-touch baseline — no prior audit or commitment history exists for this site.
• Flower Room 2 has no substrate (TEROS) probes — only climate sensors (Atmos 14 + EE894). VWC, dryback, pore EC, substrate temp and shot cadence are NOT measured in this room, so its watering program cannot be graded. The substrate charts render empty by design.
• Flower Room 1's substrate probes were placed into media mid-window (~2026-06-06). Before that the probes read in-air (~0.5% VWC). Irrigation stats (dryback, shots, peak VWC, EC) are computed from the placement date forward (~4 days), not the full 14 days — so they're directional, and the next audit with a full cycle will be more precise.
• Shot counts and P1/P2 cadence in Room 1 are DERIVED, not measured — a "shot" is a VWC step-up of ≥0.8 pp between consecutive ~9-min samples. No flow-meter or valve-event telemetry exists. Counts are reliable for rhythm/consistency; absolute shot sizes (% of substrate volume) aren't graded.
• No runoff series exists for this facility — runoff % and runoff EC can't be graded. A drain sensor or a manual runoff log would unlock leaching analysis.
• Substrate type is not set in the AROYA room config — target bands are therefore generic. The signal (high daily peak VWC ~69%, deep drybacks) reads like rockwool or a high-water-holding block, but isn't confirmed.
• Both rooms DO have CO₂ sensing (EE894 in each), so CO₂ is graded. Clock times are local Alaska time (AKDT, UTC−8), with lights-on estimated from each room's diurnal air-temp ramp.
• Overnight dryback (absolute pp) = daily peak VWC − the following pre-irrigation low on the zone-mean series. Per AROYA convention, never expressed relative to field capacity.