Facility 3920 · Burly Botanicals · OKC · 14d real series · 06-23 v2
AROYA · 2-Week Facility Audit · Cultivation Intelligence

Burly Botanicals · Irrigation, Climate & Steering

14-day deep dive · 5 rooms · Coco 2-gal Char-Coir · phase-aware crop-steering review · merged against May 8 (6-week) + June 9 (2-week) commitments · real 6-min cadence stitched from AROYA public_api
FacilityBurly Botanicals (ID 3920) Window2026-06-08 → 2026-06-22 (14 days) SubstrateCoco 2-gal Char-Coir Rooms in scopeEast A · East B · West A · West B · R/D Customer contactsMichael Fayak (owner / feed-EC) · Brittany Durham (grower / climate-VPD, since Feb 2026) Report date2026-06-23

1 · Headline Findings

East A Feed EC
1.11 mS
May-8 target 2.3–2.6 mS · STILL not implemented · substrate EC bled 3.22 → 1.73 mS over 8d before sensors went silent
West B EC Stacking
+110%
Substrate pore EC 2.19 → 4.62 mS over 14d · May-8 recipe doing exactly what it should
West A Substrate Stack
+4.0 mS
Drain 7.00 vs feed 3.00 mean · cleanest steering signature in the facility · ripening on track
East B Recipe Live
2.89 mS
Feed EC ramped 1.18 → 2.89 mS as room came online 06-18 · stack 1.85 → 3.46 mS · correct
West-side VPD gap
0.93 kPa
14d mean · bulking target 1.2–1.4 · still short by 0.27 kPa · cool canopy (71.7°F)
East A Sensors Silent
Since 06-15
Substrate stack dropped offline mid-window · climate sensors normal · cannot re-grade past 06-15
Critical — East A May-8 commitment NEVER implemented, substrate EC bled out, then sensors went silent
East A (12403) had 8 days of substrate data this window before sensors dropped on 06-15. Over those 8 days: feed EC averaged 1.11 mS (target 2.3–2.6+), substrate pore EC declined 3.22 → 1.73 mS (-46%), drain EC fell 4.47 → 1.97 mS. This is the room that was already on a FAIL flag from June 9 — the data confirms the recipe was never changed and the substrate is now below the coco maintenance floor. After 06-15 the substrate sensor stack goes silent (climate sensors still reporting) which means we can't see what happened in the back half of the window. Two actions: (1) raise feed EC in East A to ≥ 2.6 mS today, (2) confirm whether substrate sensors were pulled or dropped off the mesh.
Positive — West B substrate EC doubled, May-8 recipe working as intended
West B (12406) substrate pore EC climbed from 2.19 → 4.62 mS across the full 14 days, drain EC tracked 2.23 → 5.58 mS, drip steady at 2.4-2.6. That's a textbook bulking EC stack. The substrate-steering side of West B is doing what it should. The remaining problem is climate: VPD 0.93 mean (target 1.2–1.4), air temp 71.7°F, RH 65% — the canopy is still running too cool for a bulking room.
Positive — West A is the cleanest steering signature in the facility
West A (16868) ran 14 full days of 77.7% peak / 57.7% trough → 20 pp absolute dryback (lower edge of 25-35 pp ripening band), feed EC 3.00 mS holding, drain EC building 6.54 → 7.67 mS, substrate EC 4.55 → 5.58 mS. Drain−drip spread is +4.0 mS. Don't touch the recipe. For a deeper P3 in the final week, step ASI DOWN one notch (GEN 3 → GEN 2 = the MORE aggressive direction).
Watch — R/D climate runs vegetative, substrate signal is moving but light
R/D (12409) VPD 0.71, RH 77%, CO₂ 934 ppm, dryback 10.7 pp average — vegetative signature, not mid-flower. Substrate EC climbing 2.7 → 3.06 mS. Either a deliberate veg/early-flower pilot or an HVAC limit; flagging for Michael to confirm intent.

3 · Per-Room Phase Breakdown · Compare Mode

Click a room chip to view a single room's panel. Click Compare to overlay multiple rooms on the same chart — chips become multi-select. Dryback is reported as absolute percentage points (peak − trough VWC). Phase targets pair observed numbers with the practitioner range for the phase.

Compare rooms
Compare mode is ON. Click chips to toggle rooms on/off the overlay. Each room shows as a separate colored line on every chart.

Substrate VWC dryback — absolute pp per day

Substrate pore-EC (mS) — daily mean

Lights-on VPD (kPa) — daily mean

CO₂ (ppm) — daily mean

Flower East A (A1–A4) #12403

CRITICAL — substrate EC bled out, sensors offline 06-15 · Substrate sensors live 06-08 → 06-15, then went silent · substrate coverage 57% (8/14d)
Phase target: 25–35 pp dryback · substrate EC restacked 6.0–8.0 mS · VPD 1.4–1.6 kPa
VWC peak (14d mean)
73.3%
daily lights-on peak
VWC trough (14d mean)
52.6%
pre-irrigation trough
Absolute dryback
20.8 pp
peak − trough
Substrate pore-EC
2.37 mS
pulling back -1.49 mS
Feed EC (drip)
1.11 mS
drip-line
Drain EC
3.16 mS
drain−drip 2.05 mS
VPD (14d mean)
1.17 kPa
Air temp / RH
73.3°F / 58.1%
CO₂
1375 ppm
THIS IS THE FAIL. East A had substrate data for 06-08 through 06-15. Over those 8 days: feed EC averaged 1.11 mS (target 2.3–2.6+), substrate pore EC FELL from 3.22 → 1.73 mS (-46%), drain EC fell 4.47 → 1.97 mS. The May-8 commitment was NOT implemented in this room and substrate is bleeding salts exactly as predicted at the June 9 audit. Then on 06-15-16 the substrate sensors went silent — climate sensors still report, soil_moist/pore_ec/drip/drain all blank. Need to know from Michael: (a) why feed EC was never raised in East A, and (b) whether sensors were pulled deliberately or dropped off the mesh.

Substrate VWC — daily peak, trough & absolute-pp dryback (P3 lever)

Substrate pore-EC stack (drip → substrate → drain, mS)

Lights-on VPD (kPa) & air temp (°F)

4 · Recommendations

GrowerCRIT
Raise East A (12403) feed EC to ≥ 2.6 mS today — the May-8 commitment is still not implemented and substrate is below the coco floor.
8 days of substrate data this window confirm the original FAIL: feed 1.11 mS, substrate EC 3.22 → 1.73 mS (-46%), drain EC 4.47 → 1.97 mS. Don't wait for the sensors to come back; raise feed in the recipe now. Expected effect: drain EC stabilizes within 48h, substrate EC stops bleeding.
GrowerCRIT
Walk East A and verify substrate sensor status — pulled, retired, or off-mesh?
soil_moist / pore_ec / drip / drain all went silent for East A on 06-15. Climate sensors still report normally. Either TEROS-12 nodes were physically pulled (room flipped or torn down), or the substrate node dropped off the Wirepas mesh. Re-pair if it's a mesh issue.
GrowerWARN
Drop West-side dehumidifier RH setpoint 5-8 points during lights-on to close the bulking VPD gap.
West B VPD 0.93 mean, West A 0.95, target 1.2–1.4. Air temp 70-72°F is cool, RH 62-65% is mid. Pulling RH setpoint to 58-60% during lights-on should lift VPD into 1.1+ band. Watch substrate VWC next morning — if dryback deepens, plants were transpiration-limited (good sign).
GrowerWARN
Leave West A (16868) recipe alone — for a deeper P3 in the final week step ASI DOWN (GEN 3 → GEN 2), not up.
West A is the cleanest steering signature in the facility — 20 pp dryback every day, drain EC building, substrate EC concentrating into finish. Don't chase the VPD 0.95 reading. If a deeper finish is wanted, step ASI DOWN one notch — that's the MORE aggressive direction (GEN 1 = deepest, GEN 5 = neutral).
ProcessWARN
Confirm phase intent for R/D Flower (12409) with Michael.
VPD 0.71, RH 77%, CO₂ 934 ppm, dryback 10.7 pp — climate and substrate read vegetative/early flower, not mid-flower. Document whether this room is running a propagation cycle deliberately, or whether the irrigation recipe is over-watering for a flower phase.
ProcessINFO
Document customer-stated targets per room before the next audit.
Practitioner ranges are what we grade against today because explicit Burly-stated goals (target dryback %, substrate EC ceiling, VPD per phase) aren't in the file. Capture Michael's intended values per room — even one sentence each — so the next audit grades deviation from goal, not deviation from textbook.
ProcessINFO
Confirm AUTOMAIT enablement status.
AUTOMAIT was purchased but not enabled at the May 8 audit. Worth a short check-in: West A is the clean candidate for a single-room AUTOMAIT pilot if Michael wants to start. If already enabled, pull AUTOMAIT config and compare actual irrigation events to guardrails before the next audit.

5 · Open Questions

6 · Appendix · Data & Methodology

Data sources

Methodology

Data quality flags